A wave of transformative technology is sweeping through the entertainment industry, and with it comes the potential for controversy. A.I. generators like Midjourney are rapidly advancing, inching closer towards the ability to replicate movies frame by frame. The question that looms in the air is this: will studios allow A.I. to alter their projects for fan satisfaction, or will they resist this technological play?
It’s no secret that Hollywood and the guilds have engaged in battles against the rise of generative artificial intelligence. As the use of human-mimicking chatbots became a point of contention during strikes, creators turned to the courts. A.I. firms faced accusations of mass-scale copyright infringement as their works allegedly served as training materials.
The real question here is why major studios, unlike other rights holders, have refrained from suing to safeguard their intellectual property. There are theories circulating – are they negotiating with A.I. companies? Is the possibility of studios striking a licensing deal on the horizon? Or is there a darker motive involving the desire to leverage these tools to cut labor costs?
Amidst this legal and ethical landscape, another group is feeling the impact of this technological sea change. Concept artists like Southen are finding their market shrinking as they grapple with competing against the chatbots they inadvertently contributed to creating.
As the courts grapple with unprecedented questions of copyright law, the future relationship between Hollywood studios and A.I. companies remains uncertain. Stay tuned as we witness this unfolding saga that has the potential to reshape the entertainment industry as we know it.
The post “Will Hollywood Studios be taking A.I. to court? Well, Maybe.” appeared first on The Boston News Tribune.
Boston News Tribune 